I’l confess to being somewhat puzzled by this one.
And, I should note, frequently they’re played for comedy, no matter how serious the original was.
So, I’m hardly surprised when a Verne movie is radically different from the original. But it is decidedly strange when it’s based on one of Verne’s most absurd comedies, The Begum’s Fortune, but isn’t a comedy.
Yes, there are a few comic moments here and there, but ultimately, the film resembles a Western Cold War spy movie more than anything else, and plays out quite seriously. Which, unfortunately, is a bit of a let down when one expects a typically absurd Czech SF comedy.
Nor, as we expect from a Verne movie, does it focus on the Victorian age inventions. Yes, as in the original, there is a giant cannon (although the villain’s failure to calculate escape velocity is ignored in favor of a more routine ending), but that’s about it, except for the car traveling around Steel City, with a series of exhausted servants hired to walk in front of it carrying a red flag (a historical reference, rather than a Jules Verne fantasy).
Instead we get a whole subplot about a young boy who is pawn in the war between the two cities.
It’s interesting to note that the French vs. German references in the original have vanished, with “Ville-France” conveniently becoming “Fortuna.” As have the fairly wacky ideas Verne had for this Utopian state – like the fresh air fiend houses that would probably be breezier than not having any walls at all.
One other minor surprise came because I’d expected that the dictatorial state of Steel City would be used as a thinly veiled criticism of Communism, as was true in many of the later Soviet Bloc SF films. Admittedly, this was rare in Czech SF after 1970 or so, thanks to the Soviet tanks that crushed the Prague Spring, but I still expected the book’s oppressive, militaristic, massively-centralized government would lend itself nicely to satire, while giving the filmmakers a little cover. I suspect there might be more satire here than I realize, and yet it is muted at best. Although it does come close with one element borrowed from the original, when the entire, centralized state falls apart once the man leading everything from the top is gone.
However, neither does the film place much emphasis on the villain’s Capitalism or on Ville-France’s Utopianianism, as one might expect from a Marxist bias.
This is not the best Czech SF film – nor is it their best Jules Verne film! It has a few good moments and looks quite good, with a lot of attention to period detail, but still seems a bit disappointing when one’s expectations for Czech SF are so high.
So file it under “modest”, and try not to watch it back to back with Adele Hasn’t Had Her Dinner Yet or Tomorrow I Shall Wake Up and Scald Myself With Tea.
It’ll just seem more disappointing that way.